<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers</id>
  <title type="text">microsoft.public.development.device.drivers Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Microsoft developers newsgroup.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="microsoft.public.development.device.drivers feed"/>
  <updated>2010-03-11T00:04:40Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.dk" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Deodiaus</name>
  <email>deodi...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T00:04:40Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/e2b8dbdf411eb83e/2e3df81cbdd195dd?show_docid=2e3df81cbdd195dd</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/e2b8dbdf411eb83e/2e3df81cbdd195dd?show_docid=2e3df81cbdd195dd"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Linksys WRTP54G-VR</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The install hangs on the last step, displaying 99% complete, but never &lt;br&gt; finishes (even after an hour). &lt;br&gt; It did this before too.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Maxim S. Shatskih</name>
  <email>ma...@storagecraft.com.no.spam</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-10T22:32:29Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/e2b8dbdf411eb83e/e95f75e2158ce462?show_docid=e95f75e2158ce462</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/e2b8dbdf411eb83e/e95f75e2158ce462?show_docid=e95f75e2158ce462"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Linksys WRTP54G-VR</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Can you set up the router without installing any drivers using Telnet or web interface?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Deodiaus</name>
  <email>deodi...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-10T21:16:53Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/e2b8dbdf411eb83e/f05a2de0cb3965cb?show_docid=f05a2de0cb3965cb</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/e2b8dbdf411eb83e/f05a2de0cb3965cb?show_docid=f05a2de0cb3965cb"/>
  <title type="text">Linksys WRTP54G-VR</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I have a Linksys WRTP54G-VR &lt;br&gt; Wireless Broadband G router. &lt;br&gt; hooked up to a Motorola SB4200 via the LAN cable to Comcast. &lt;br&gt; It is connected to a HP Pavillion a1632x with a NVidea nForce Network &lt;br&gt; Controller card running Vista64 sp2 . It worked fine under XP64 &lt;br&gt; until my machine got a virus. &lt;br&gt; 1) &lt;br&gt; Is this device fully supported and tested under Vista64 sp2? Has
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Don Burn</name>
  <email>b...@stopspam.windrvr.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-10T19:24:33Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/7114a6e4b4efa1f0/09fb0dd0302db5b0?show_docid=09fb0dd0302db5b0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/7114a6e4b4efa1f0/09fb0dd0302db5b0?show_docid=09fb0dd0302db5b0"/>
  <title type="text">RE: Filter driver on boot device</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You are changing the semantics of the device model by making the disk &lt;br&gt; requests sequential that is why it crashes. Even if it does work, your &lt;br&gt; performance will stink, so this is a bad desing. &lt;br&gt; Don Burn (MVP, Windows DKD) &lt;br&gt; Windows Filesystem and Driver Consulting &lt;br&gt; Website: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.windrvr.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Blog: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://msmvps.com/blogs/WinDrvr&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>akapoor</name>
  <email>akap...@discussions.microsoft.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-10T19:19:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/7114a6e4b4efa1f0/5c888852dfc8d48f?show_docid=5c888852dfc8d48f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/7114a6e4b4efa1f0/5c888852dfc8d48f?show_docid=5c888852dfc8d48f"/>
  <title type="text">Filter driver on boot device</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I am writing a KMDF filter driver attached to the boot drive, so it loads &lt;br&gt; with start_type = 0. I only want one read/write request in flight at a time. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;When I set the following in addDevice, I get a crash with &amp;quot;Inaccessible Boot &lt;br&gt; Device:&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; WDF_IO_QUEUE_CONFIG_INIT_DEFAU LT_QUEUE &lt;br&gt; (&amp;amp;ioQueueConfig,WdfIoQueueDisp atchSequential);
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Maxim S. Shatskih</name>
  <email>ma...@storagecraft.com.no.spam</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-10T15:44:49Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/f5de2cbd79d9964d/a7eed800d0592577?show_docid=a7eed800d0592577</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/f5de2cbd79d9964d/a7eed800d0592577?show_docid=a7eed800d0592577"/>
  <title type="text">Re: C2220 &amp; 32bit app on 64 bit driver</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  This conradicts what you said above about the structure size &amp;quot;matching fine&amp;quot;. It does not. &lt;br&gt; If you want to simplify the driver - then replace all pointers in the structures with ULONGLONGs (8byte on all platforms), and, in 32bit apps, cast (ULONGLONG)(ULONG)Ptr. &lt;br&gt; In the 32bit version of the driver, you will need to cast down.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Don Burn</name>
  <email>b...@stopspam.windrvr.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-10T13:20:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/f5de2cbd79d9964d/9b264998e767b37d?show_docid=9b264998e767b37d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/f5de2cbd79d9964d/9b264998e767b37d?show_docid=9b264998e767b37d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: C2220 &amp; 32bit app on 64 bit driver</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  ULONG_PTR is always defined for a driver so I don&#39;t see what your logic is &lt;br&gt; doing. Also, PtrToUlong should only be used to convert a pointer to an &lt;br&gt; integer, using it to take create a pointer is a bug. &lt;br&gt; Finally, your whole interface is broken. You should avoid at all costs &lt;br&gt; having a pointer in an IOCTL structure. Not only can you not make this
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Kota</name>
  <email>k...@discussions.microsoft.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-10T11:44:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/f5de2cbd79d9964d/c76926680346ac8a?show_docid=c76926680346ac8a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/f5de2cbd79d9964d/c76926680346ac8a?show_docid=c76926680346ac8a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: C2220 &amp; 32bit app on 64 bit driver</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; Thanks for your inputs. &lt;br&gt; I have used the &amp;quot;PtrToUlong&amp;quot; function for coverting the void * pointer to my &lt;br&gt; datatype ULONG_PTR, it avoided the C2220 error and working fine. &lt;br&gt; I am using the below typedef to replace void pointer in my IOCTL structures &lt;br&gt; and replaced the ULONG to ULONG32 in my structures. &lt;br&gt; All os my IOCTL structures variables are void * or ULONG32 size variables.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Maxim S. Shatskih</name>
  <email>ma...@storagecraft.com.no.spam</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-10T10:10:20Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/08e81a336dfdd7b9/c7659f80ea2bbc6b?show_docid=c7659f80ea2bbc6b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/08e81a336dfdd7b9/c7659f80ea2bbc6b?show_docid=c7659f80ea2bbc6b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WMI in drivers</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I would duplicate all functions in both interfaces, and write the app to use IOCTLs only. &lt;br&gt; Such a separation is just extra unnecessary complexity for the app, and has no logical meaning or positive value. &lt;br&gt; IOCTLs and WMI are both just access methods, nothing else - IOCTLs more suitable for high performance and C/C++, WMI - for scripting languages.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Andey</name>
  <email>and...@telemed.lt</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-10T09:58:53Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/08e81a336dfdd7b9/3cfc2f1e679d26b0?show_docid=3cfc2f1e679d26b0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/08e81a336dfdd7b9/3cfc2f1e679d26b0?show_docid=3cfc2f1e679d26b0"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WMI in drivers</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello and thank you for answer. &lt;br&gt; Probably I have described by wish correctly. I want to link WMI class &lt;br&gt; instance and device symbolic name that is used for CreateFile function call. &lt;br&gt; Our device will have WMI interface to retrieve device states (such as supply &lt;br&gt; voltage) and regular IOCTL interface to peroform read/write operations. And
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Slavo Tomascik</name>
  <email>slavotomas...@discussions.microsoft.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-09T20:39:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/b5ff7d9a6571ee83/9a67782df8ce6c10?show_docid=9a67782df8ce6c10</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/b5ff7d9a6571ee83/9a67782df8ce6c10?show_docid=9a67782df8ce6c10"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Windows7 send wrong USB data payload after wake from sleep mod</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I&#39;ve made test as you recommend. It&#39;s G45/ICH10 chipset, and in device &lt;br&gt; manager are two EHCI and couple of UHCIs. All USB devices was disconnected, &lt;br&gt; then all controllers disabled and reenabled. Failure still occur. &lt;br&gt; This was great idea, but what can i do next? Test of another motherboard &lt;br&gt; show same error, therefore this should not to be problem of piece of hw. I
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Slavo Tomascik</name>
  <email>slavotomas...@discussions.microsoft.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-09T20:18:04Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/b5ff7d9a6571ee83/fe10381c3914625c?show_docid=fe10381c3914625c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/b5ff7d9a6571ee83/fe10381c3914625c?show_docid=fe10381c3914625c"/>
  <title type="text">RE: Hub and Tracker the problem- use a USBtracer</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Obiously tracker is connected before hub, but capture was made also after hub &lt;br&gt; with the same results. I think, it&#39;s not Ellisys missrecording or HUB &lt;br&gt; problem. Also this error exact explain of the device behavior - device &lt;br&gt; receive wrong command, therefore readed device status (interrupt transfer) &lt;br&gt; never reach requested value.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Zbynek</name>
  <email>zby...@discussions.microsoft.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-09T19:19:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/71f9a2172123b0e1/51d3aec9976cc4ee?show_docid=51d3aec9976cc4ee</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/71f9a2172123b0e1/51d3aec9976cc4ee?show_docid=51d3aec9976cc4ee"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Our disk&#39;s driver run properly compiled for 32bit and not for</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  So, I was testing driver for last week :-) &lt;br&gt; To your questions - this driver is filter driver (system sends request to &lt;br&gt; this driver and this driver send I/O request to low level drivers - ntfs/fat). &lt;br&gt; I install it now by myself (start/stop), but in full version it will be &lt;br&gt; install by inf file and running all time (start when user log in and stop
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Jeff</name>
  <email>jeffrey.m.w...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-09T18:15:02Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/b2dac8f587cad105/932815635f40ffa8?show_docid=932815635f40ffa8</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/b2dac8f587cad105/932815635f40ffa8?show_docid=932815635f40ffa8"/>
  <title type="text">DevCon to remove ghost devices &quot;remove failed&quot;</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello, &lt;br&gt; I just pulled a Virtual Tape Library out of my backup environment and &lt;br&gt; am now having some stability issues with the remaining devices. In &lt;br&gt; working with the vendor, they suggested I check for ghost tape drives &lt;br&gt; that could cause issues. Sure enough they are there. When using &lt;br&gt; devcon, I run: &lt;br&gt; devcon findall =tapedrive
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Abhishek R [MSFT]</name>
  <email>abhish...@online.microsoft.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-09T16:22:17Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/9db8455b94b9c532/6718472a5811f0a3?show_docid=6718472a5811f0a3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.dk/group/microsoft.public.development.device.drivers/browse_thread/thread/9db8455b94b9c532/6718472a5811f0a3?show_docid=6718472a5811f0a3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WdfIoTargetOpen fails in opening the remote I/O</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Just to make sure, did you correctly set the TMF file before attempting to &lt;br&gt; view the log? The extension is !wdftmffile.
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
