Gmail Kalender Dokumenter Læser Nettet mere »
Senest besøgte grupper | Hjælp | Log ind
Google Grupper startside
White House meeting
Der er for øjeblikket for mange emner i denne gruppe, som skal vises øverst. For at vise dette emne først skal du fjerne denne mulighed fra et andet emne.
Der opstod en fejl under behandling af din anmodning. Prøv igen.
marker
  7 indlæg - Skjul alle  -  Oversæt alt til Oversat (Vis alle oprindelige)
Gruppen, du sender indlæg til, er en Usenet-gruppe. Indlæg til denne gruppe vil gøre din e-mail-adresse synlig for alle på internettet.
Dit svar er ikke blevet sendt.
Dit indlæg er blevet sendt
 
Fra:
Til:
Cc:
Opfølgning til:
Tilføj cc | Tilføj opfølgning til | Rediger emne
Emne:
Validering:
Indtast de tegn, du ser på billedet nedenfor, eller de numre, du hører, ved at klikke på adgangsikonet for at bekræfte. Lyt og indtast de tal, du hører
 
Ulysses at Langdale Tarn  
Se profil   Oversæt til Oversat (vis oprindelig)
 Flere valgmuligheder 3 Feb., 12:08
Nyhedsgrupper: soc.history, us.military.army, sci.military.naval
Fra: Ulysses at Langdale Tarn <davidholi...@yahoo.com>
Dato: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 03:08:08 -0800 (PST)
Lokalt: On. 3 Feb. 2010 12:08
Emne: White House meeting
Last Saturday or Sunday former President George H.W.
Bush and his son Jeb met with Obama for 30 minutes.
Later, when queried by the media, Bush Sr. replied
"It was a good meeting."  My rightwing connection draws
a blank on this event.  The parameters are:

1. Meeting follows on the heels of Presidential address to
joint session of Congress and 1.5 hr session with GOP
caucus.
2. A family or group audience always has greater impact
on authorities than an individual audience.

Any thoughts on the focus and content of the meeting?

G:\word95\mydocuments\opinion\?meeting110.doc
3 II 2010 CE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


    Videresend  
Log ind, før du kan sende indlæg.
For at sende et indlæg skal du først tilmelde dig gruppen.
Opdater dit kaldenavn på siden Abonnementsindstillinger, før du sender.
Du har ikke den krævede tilladelse til at sende.
Jack Linthicum  
Se profil   Oversæt til Oversat (vis oprindelig)
 Flere valgmuligheder 3 Feb., 13:39
Nyhedsgrupper: soc.history, us.military.army, sci.military.naval
Fra: Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net>
Dato: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 04:39:23 -0800 (PST)
Lokalt: On. 3 Feb. 2010 13:39
Emne: Re: White House meeting
On Feb 3, 6:08 am, Ulysses at  Langdale Tarn <davidholi...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

George H.W. wants Jeb to run for President in 2012. He used the
meeting as an excuse to show Jeb where the stuff was.

    Videresend  
Log ind, før du kan sende indlæg.
For at sende et indlæg skal du først tilmelde dig gruppen.
Opdater dit kaldenavn på siden Abonnementsindstillinger, før du sender.
Du har ikke den krævede tilladelse til at sende.
Ulysses at Langdale Tarn  
Se profil   Oversæt til Oversat (vis oprindelig)
 Flere valgmuligheder 4 Feb., 12:37
Nyhedsgrupper: soc.history, us.military.army, sci.military.naval
Fra: Ulysses at Langdale Tarn <davidholi...@yahoo.com>
Dato: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 03:37:42 -0800 (PST)
Lokalt: To. 4 Feb. 2010 12:37
Emne: Re: White House meeting
On Feb 3, 6:39 am, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net> wrote:

~~~~~
That's interesting , Jack.  I was thinking Jeb was out of politics
after a long run as Florida governor.  I am thinking that whatever
Bush Sr. spoke to, he wanted a witness so that there would be no
misinterpretation or misunderstanding of the message.
My guess about Obama (and my cue is the Beer Summit) is that
there were no recording devices and that the Prez had only one witness
for himself.

What I am hoping is that Bush Sr. as de facto leader of the GOP,
was approached by a group of un-named party members who want to
vote up certain elements of health care reform before the momentum
for reform is lost.

I see this President as willing to open the domestic market to
Canadian
and Mexican formularies at some time this year.  Once that happens,
there will be no going back to a negotiated healthcare package,
and seniors as a whole will abandon most Medicare Part D insurors.

Just a thought.

David H
~~~~~~~~~~~


    Videresend  
Log ind, før du kan sende indlæg.
For at sende et indlæg skal du først tilmelde dig gruppen.
Opdater dit kaldenavn på siden Abonnementsindstillinger, før du sender.
Du har ikke den krævede tilladelse til at sende.
Jack Linthicum  
Se profil   Oversæt til Oversat (vis oprindelig)
 Flere valgmuligheder 4 Feb., 13:46
Nyhedsgrupper: soc.history, us.military.army, sci.military.naval
Fra: Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net>
Dato: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 04:46:01 -0800 (PST)
Lokalt: To. 4 Feb. 2010 13:46
Emne: Re: White House meeting
On Feb 4, 6:37 am, Ulysses at  Langdale Tarn <davidholi...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Just a clue but perhaps 41 was trying to reach across from the
"normal" Republicans to the President and brought his son along as an
idea for a bridge between the two parties. Dreamland but better than
trying to remember where he left that peanut butter and jelly sandwich
back in 91.

    Videresend  
Log ind, før du kan sende indlæg.
For at sende et indlæg skal du først tilmelde dig gruppen.
Opdater dit kaldenavn på siden Abonnementsindstillinger, før du sender.
Du har ikke den krævede tilladelse til at sende.
Ulysses at Langdale Tarn  
Se profil   Oversæt til Oversat (vis oprindelig)
 Flere valgmuligheder 6 Feb., 09:37
Nyhedsgrupper: soc.history, us.military.army, sci.military.naval
Fra: Ulysses at Langdale Tarn <davidholi...@yahoo.com>
Dato: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 00:37:29 -0800 (PST)
Lokalt: Lø. 6 Feb. 2010 09:37
Emne: Re: White House meeting
On Feb 4, 6:46 am, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net> wrote:

~~~~~~~~~
Yes, quite so.  He was a one term president.  Although I never
understood
why going back on a single campaign promise ("No new taxes") was
enough to sink his ship in '91. To me, Bush Sr. was a bit like
Eisenhower.
Someone who could be bi-partisan in order to govern effectively.

Pundit Brooks, speaking on PBS news, explained that the Senate is
designed so that one gadfly or underdog can effectively stop the
government
on specifics like bureaucratic appointments and controversial
legislation.
The Shelby blockade is just the latest example.  Unfortunately this
Alabama Senator may have prevented a Homeland Security appointment
that just might have stopped the Christmas bomber.  Homeland Security
still has major unfilled billets.

I think the Healthcare cost rollercoaster is going to result in a
dramatic
change in the way Americans  buy prescription drugs.  Opening selected
industries to foreign competition is a technique used by the German
CDU
postwar governments.  The CDU controlled German capitalists with the
threat of opening selected markets to foreign penetration.  Vlad Putin
has
used the same method to keep Russian oligarchs in harness.

David H
~~~~~~~


    Videresend  
Log ind, før du kan sende indlæg.
For at sende et indlæg skal du først tilmelde dig gruppen.
Opdater dit kaldenavn på siden Abonnementsindstillinger, før du sender.
Du har ikke den krævede tilladelse til at sende.
Jack Linthicum  
Se profil   Oversæt til Oversat (vis oprindelig)
 Flere valgmuligheder 6 Feb., 12:18
Nyhedsgrupper: soc.history, us.military.army, sci.military.naval
Fra: Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net>
Dato: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 03:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Lokalt: Lø. 6 Feb. 2010 12:18
Emne: Re: White House meeting
On Feb 6, 3:37 am, Ulysses at  Langdale Tarn <davidholi...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Administrators don't stop terrorists, good discipline from the top
down and a spirit of cooperation stops terrorists. "I know something
you don't know" belongs in third grade.

    Videresend  
Log ind, før du kan sende indlæg.
For at sende et indlæg skal du først tilmelde dig gruppen.
Opdater dit kaldenavn på siden Abonnementsindstillinger, før du sender.
Du har ikke den krævede tilladelse til at sende.
Ulysses at Langdale Tarn  
Se profil   Oversæt til Oversat (vis oprindelig)
 Flere valgmuligheder 7 Feb., 09:07
Nyhedsgrupper: soc.history, us.military.army, sci.military.naval
Fra: Ulysses at Langdale Tarn <davidholi...@yahoo.com>
Dato: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 00:07:09 -0800 (PST)
Lokalt: Sø. 7 Feb. 2010 09:07
Emne: Re: White House meeting
On Feb 6, 5:18 am, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net> wrote:

~~~
You don't have good discipline, good communication, and good
information
flow without good aministrators.  Let's compare Napolitano and Gates.
Napolitano's bureaucracy is so bloated and overblown that the best she
can do is appoint good administrators and then focus on her own past
successes with border control.  I don't know if she promoted the
Mexican
Navy as executioner of druglords or if she had a subordinate with the
brains to beef up their navy. The Mex. Army is much more vulnerable to
bribery, whereas you cannot easily buy off  the crew of a ship at sea.

I mention this because border control means knowing everything that is
happening in Mexico, specifically their border states.  The killing of
the
highschool students at Ciudad Juarez should never have happened.  The
Mex. Army should have an agent with a concealed cel-phone at every
social gathering in Juarez.  You either do this or you go to martial
law.
If Napolitano cannot stop the druglords in Juarez, then she cannot
stop
kidnappings and contracted hits from spreading to our side of the
border.

David H
~~~~~~


    Videresend  
Log ind, før du kan sende indlæg.
For at sende et indlæg skal du først tilmelde dig gruppen.
Opdater dit kaldenavn på siden Abonnementsindstillinger, før du sender.
Du har ikke den krævede tilladelse til at sende.
Ikke flere indlæg
« Tilbage til diskussioner « Nyere emne     Ældre emne »

Opret en gruppe Google Grupper - Google startside - Servicevilkår - Politik til beskyttelse af personlige oplysninger
©2010 Google